New Paper on Counter-improvised Explosive Device Responses for Contemporary Threat Environments

Since the early 2000s, counter-improvised explosive device (C-IED) doctrine has been organized around three complementary functions: ‘Defeat the device, prepare the force, and attack the network’. These remain central to C-IED measures today. However, experience over the past two decades has highlighted the importance of looking beyond individual devices and attacks to understand the wider conditions in which IED threats emerge, persist, and evolve.

Effective C-IED responses require more than technical and operational capabilities. They also depend on a comprehensive understanding of the threat, coherent national policies and institutional arrangements, effective inter-agency and regional cooperation, and attention to the risks and harm experienced by affected populations.

Beyond the Device: Rethinking C-IED for Contemporary Threat Environments—a new Situation Update from the Small Arms Survey—draws on the Survey’s research, national assessments, and capacity support experience to examine how states and international partners can develop threat-informed, context specific, and adaptable C-IED responses. It also explores how C-IED responses can connect appropriately with wider efforts to reduce IED-related risks and harm, while respecting distinct mandates and principles.


Read: Beyond the Device: Rethinking C-IED for Contemporary Threat Environments


For more, check out:


Other news from the Survey: