New HSBA Briefing Paper on Sudan, multipolarity, and the limits of US influence

Since the end of the Cold War, US unipolarity gave Washington considerable influence over Sudan’s political trajectory. That relationship has changed. As the world moves towards a more multipolar order, US leverage over Sudan has sharply declined, while Sudan’s military leaders and influential regional states have gained greater latitude to pursue their own interests. The result, this Briefing Paper argues, made ending Sudan’s civil war difficult.

Sudan and the Emerging World Order: From US Unipolarity to Multipolarity—a new Briefing Paper from the Small Arms Survey’s Human Security Baseline Assessment for Sudan and South Sudan project—examines the changing role of the US in Sudan from the post-Cold War period to the present, including the effects of US unipolarity, the consequences of the shift towards multipolarity, and how the current administration’s efforts to reassert US power in an international order in which Washington’s ability to shape political outcomes has diminished. 


Read: Sudan and the Emerging World Order: From US Unipolarity to Multipolarity


For more, check out:


Other news from the Survey: